Support Us

You are browsing the archive for Business.

And so corporations begin to open data…

July 27, 2011 in Business, Open Data

The following post is by Francis Irving, CEO of ScraperWiki.

Now it seems almost normal that red in tooth and claw competitors, like Microsoft and Google, are both major contributors to the latest version of a popular open source operating system kernel.

Businesses are gradually realising they can share the costs of anything based on intellectual property which isn’t key to their business advantage. For example, this year Facebook opened up the hardware designs of their data centres.

Governments are struggling forwards and backwards to open up data about their work, ultimately to gain similar efficiencies and strategic advantages.

What about companies opening data?

On the right is Hannah Jones. She heads up Nike’s Sustainable Business and Innovation group. Yes, the trainer company.

She’s backed in what she does by Nike’s seemingly very forward thinking CEO, Mark Parker. He previously set up GreenXchange, for better sharing patents related to the environment (detailed writeup, scraped list of all the patents).

Nike have a surprisingly long history of releasing data. Back in 2000, they started publishing a list of all their contracted factories (scraped list by Selena Deckelmann) and related audit information. The aim? To improve their factory working conditions, both by improved scrutiny of Nike’s own measurement systems, and by enabling direct on the ground inspection and campaigning by activists.

Recently Nike have shifted it up a gear. They’re lucky to be based in Portland in the US, where there is a rampant community of open data activists. Following a strange story of an advertising agency, a sort of startup incubator and a hack day, back in April Nike started advertising to recruit a “Code for a Better World Fellow”.

Anyone reading this blog will find the description in the job advert strangely alluring.

The ideal candidate will be part developer/programmer, part researcher, part designer, part business analyst. He or she will have demonstrated expert experience with databases, programming in multiple languages, in visual design and with statistics. He or she will have an understanding of the existing open data communities and networks of visual designers and researchers who love data.

 

Why do they want this person? You can piece the broad picture, but not the details, together from the job advert and an article in Forbes.

They’re terrified.

Not terrified of bad PR due to human rights violations like in the 1990s (“Nike suffered from these blows, losing contracts and its good rapport with many consumers“).

Terrified that there won’t be enough water to grow cheap cotton. Terrified that oil prices will continue to shoot up, and they won’t be able to afford international shipping. Terrified that the delicate, beautiful-if-flawed civilisation that we’ve built won’t last in a form where enough people can afford to take part in organised, well equipped sport.

Some of those problems can only be fixed by changing entire supply chains. For example, someone told me that cotton recycling will only work if all their competitors, with whom they share upstream factories, also change to it. Doing that well requires sharing data, and helping others know your data about the scale of the difficulties.

Some of those problems can only be fixed by the invention of new products and services. Startups radically disrupting things – startups that will be more likely the more people understand Nike’s problems.

They want to release data to get:

Disruptive, radical, jaw-dropping innovation. Innovation we cannot imagine. That kind of innovation is not going to come only from within.

 

That quote is from the job advert again.

Unfortunately the bad news is that Nike have made their hire, so you can’t apply for it. The good people at Code for America helped them do their recruitment.

Who have they hired?

It’s barely leaked out onto the Internet (you can spot it in here, an announcement of an event on the 6th August that you must go to if you are in San Francisco). So, dear reader of this blog post, you’re the first to know.

Ward Cunningham.

You might recognise the name, he invented the wiki.

Open data research at Aalto University Business School

July 8, 2011 in Business, External, Open Data

The following guest post is by Yulia Tammisto, from the Open Service Innovation Observatory at the Aalto University School of Economics, Finland.

A few months ago, myself and my colleague Dr. Juho Lindman at the Aalto University School of Economics started to explore open data academically. We are particularly interested in the business applications and economic potential of open data. So far we have done a small round of interviews in Finland with business and non-profit sector employees, and have written a couple of conference papers about the results. Interestingly, we found out that open data seemed to have a lot in common with open source from a research perspective. Now we are trying to interpret and use these similarities to better understand the phenomenon of open data and the interplay between these two concepts. We looked into open data-related services offered on the Finnish market, and tried to understand how open data-related service providers operate in order to draw a generic business model. In this process, we came to the understanding that there is no common meaning of open data shared by the different players on the market. We tried to embrace the various perceptions, and build some classification of existing meanings that industry assigns to the term “open data”.

In the future we plan to focus on developing a better understanding of what open data is in a business context and for business users, exploring the economic benefits of open data application and new business models based on open data.

None of our papers are published yet (as it takes quite a while in academia), but I am happy to share and discuss our research – just drop me a line at yulia.tammisto[at]aalto[dot]fi

It would be particularly interesting to hear about similar academic studies or projects – maybe we could join forces and make something great together!

Avatar of jwalsh

by jwalsh

Sustaining open data business

May 22, 2011 in Bibliographic, Business, Open Access, Open Data

Jo Walsh, who works as a project manager at EDINA and sits on the Open Knowledge Foundation board, writes:

These thoughts on sustaining open data business were provoked by ORCID, a not-for-profit business set up by a group of large academic publishers and a few leading universities. Its aim is to provide a central directory of researchers, with profiles describing them.

ORCID is committing to provide open source software but not necessarily open data – offering some limited “non-commercial” activity of the service. Researchers can open their data by “claiming” it but what volume of them are going to do that? Do many more than 15% of academics publish their work in their local open access institutional repository?

I want to illustrate that it is perfectly possible, if not necessary, to support a business publishing open data. Strategies for successful open data companies:

  • Charge for quality – as geonames.org offer a cleaned up better authoritative version of a somewhat crowdsourced database
  • Charge for high volume – as SimpleGeo offer 10K per day calls to the service and charge a small fee after that.
  • Charge for private data storage – as Talis offer free triplestores for linked open data, and charge for a private data service.
  • Charge for analytical capacity – Fortius One offer the free GeoCommons web map making service and charge for the GeoIQ analysis package.

Of course one can always do consultancy and custom development to cover costs. Establishing a namespace, becoming a reference point for others; geoname linked data is used because it is widely used, because it arrived early in the domain.

In a survey of potential users, the most sizeable number of ORCID prospective users thought the data would only really be useful as open data. Charging for institutional access and sponsorship are seen as ways to sustain it. Yet there plenty of ways to sustain open data business, for-profit or not or in between. We might yet get a system that really serves academic publication rather than markets to it.

Please create an account to get started.

Sign up to the Open Knowledge Newsletter

Get Updates