Francis Irving

CEO of ScraperWiki. Made several of the world's first civic websites, such as TheyWorkForYou and WhatDoTheyKnow.

More Reading

Post navigation

2 Comments

  • If I have understood correctly, the primary motivation for commissioning the review came out of the response to the OFT’s report on the Commercial Use of Public Information , not the existence of Recommendation 9 in the PoI (of course, no doubt the PoI recommendation provided additional impetus!). For more on the context of the report see the statement relating to the publication of the review on BERR’s website which among other things says:

    As part of the response, the Government commissioned Cambridge University to do some analysis specifically around the pricing of public sector information held by trading funds[i].

    This analysis has been released today as a Study Report (11 March 2008 – see Related Documents), and it sets out estimates of the costs and benefits of marginal-cost pricing, based on the assumptions used by the Cambridge team and the data they were able to collect.

    Going forward, the Government will look closely at the public sector information held by trading funds to distinguish more clearly what is required by Government for public tasks, ensuring this information is made available as widely as possible for use in actual and potential downstream markets.

    In the lead up to the next spending review, it will also ensure that it is priced appropriately. The underlying principle will be that information collected for public purposes will be made available at a price that balances the need for access while ensuring customers pay a fair contribution to the cost of collecting this information in the long-term.

    [i] The study was commissioned jointly by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and HM Treasury in July 2007. The terms of reference for the study are available upon request by contacting the BERR Enquiry Unit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

back to top