This is a post by Lisa Evans, lead researcher on Where Does My Money Go?.

When I saw the COINS data that was published at the beginning of June, I suspected there was something missing.

I had been reading about the Whole of Government Accounts (WGA) — a project to provide a really good detailed overview of government finances (more information in this previous post).

I was therefore expecting to see the local council assets and accruals data of the sort that is recorded in the L-packs as well as central government spending captured annually in the C-packs. But it wasn’t there.

I conducted some more investigation, speaking to the team at the Whole Of Government accounts. There team is really quite small — only two people in Communities and Local Government WGA team and five or six people in the Treasury — but they do an amazing job of documenting all public assets and accruals. What is more, they have been running it every year for 10 years, each year gathering a detailed picture of local authorities financial health.

Anyway, based on my existing knowledge and my conversations with the WGA team and others, I can now confidently confirm the WGA is completely absent from the COINS data that was released. This means there is no reporting of local authority’s spending in COINS. A report from the WGA is planned spring next year. But I believe this will be at a very high level of detail — the sum of the whole government’s assets and accurals, not the details of individual authorities and departments.

I have requested the 2008/2009 WGA data, with the Department of Health and the Department of Defence data removed, as I believe these two departments may have failed the relevant audit.

Now we’ll wait to see what happens.

Related posts:

  1. What was COINS missing? The mystery of the Government’s hidden spending data The following article was originally pub
  2. COINS: A Users Guide At 0930 BST today the UK government rele
  3. Understanding COINS Something amazing has happened since the
  4. The Hunt For COINS I've been investigating data for use in
  5. The COINS database — what we know and how we know it The following post is from Lisa Evans, w

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

2 Responses to “A Big Part of COINS was not Published”

  1. Tweets that mention Open Knowledge Foundation Blog » Blog Archive » A Big Part of COINS was not Published -- Topsy.com Says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Glyn Moody, dan mcquillan, okfn and others. okfn said: A Big Part of COINS was not Published http://bit.ly/aYEh5j [...]

  2. L’opendata dans tous ses états – Juillet II « Says:

    [...] A Big Part of COINS was not Published [...]

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting