Support Us

You are browsing the archive for WG Open Government Data.

Call for research proposals: open data in developing countries

August 10, 2012 in Open Data, Open Government Data, WG Development, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

The Web Foundation and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) are looking to fund case study research on the emerging impacts of open data in developing countries.

Open data policies are spreading across the world: but how does open data play out on the ground in different settings? What is needed for the potential transparency and accountability, innovation and enterprise, and social inclusion benefits of open data to be realised? How are different actors using open data to support good governance, better decision making, and better development outcomes? Those are just a few of the questions that were explored at the ‘Critical Development Perspectives on Open Government Data’ workshop held in Brasilia just before the 2012 Open Government Partnership conference this April, where the Open Data Research network was initially established.

Building on that workshop, the Web Foundation and IDRC call is looking for researchers and research institutions based in the global south to develop detailed case studies of where open data is interacting with different governance and development issues – from setting and monitoring budgets, to developing smart city infrastructures, or improving the use of funds for agricultural improvement. Selected cases will form part of a research network over 2013, coming together to look at cross cutting themes highlighted by the different case studies.

The project will fund a series of detailed case studies that examine the emerging impacts of specific on-going open data initiatives that address key development themes. Potential cases include:

  • Open data in local and national budgeting processes
  • Open data for legislation processes and elections
  • Open data in judicial systems
  • Open data for smarter cities
  • Open data for the delivery of privately provided public services
  • Open data for the regulation of markets (e.g. extractive industries)
  • Open data for the welfare and empowerment of marginalized groups and communities (e.g. data for small farmers)
  • Open data and international development

Funding of between USD$25,000 and USD$75,000 per case is available, and the application deadline is 10th September. Find the full call and more details at www.opendataresearch.org

‘En boca cerrada….’: open data in Catalunya today

July 4, 2012 in External, Featured, Open Government Data, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

sagrada familia by Olia  Saunders (oliasaunders) on 500px.com There is a popular expression in Spanish that says, ‘en boca cerrada no entran moscas.’ Its equivalent in English is ‘loose lips sink ships,’ basically meaning that you are better off just keeping quiet. This culture of secrecy, some would say discretion, is particularly true in Spain’s public administration, being traditionally pervasive at all levels. Information is too important a power resource to let go of easily. Yet, as in other countries, changes in the information environment brought about by the Internet are forcing authorities, though painfully slowly, to open their ‘papers’ – aka public sector information (PSI) – to the public . A key dimension of this opening is the publication of data by the government. In Spain, it is the regional governments, particularly Basque Country and Catalonia, that have been more emphatically pushing open data agenda.

In accordance with EU directive 2003/98/CE on the re-use of public sector information, Spain passed Law 37/2007 on 16 November 2007, but its implementation has been deficient and limited. In October 2011, the Spanish government adopted a Royal Decree implementing the Law 37/2007, taking into account the experiences and practices of its first years of application. This new regulation is an important shift in the principle of publication of public data in Spain, for it states that “data should be open and available by default and exceptions should be justified.” Spain opened its national open data portal datos.gob.es at the end of 2011. And yet still Spain doesn’t have a coherent policy for opening data.

It is in some Spanish regions where we can find more advanced initiatives towards open and reuse of PSI. The Basque Country has been a pioneer in opening their data with the launch of the Euskadi’s OpenData portal in April 2010. In Catalonia, the Parliament passed the Law 29/2010 on the use of electronic means in the public sector, which promotes the use of these means throughout the entire public sector. In November 2010, the Generalitat (Catalan regional government) opened its own open data portal Dades Obertes. At local level, a few big cities have opened their own portals: Barcelona, Badalona and Lleida.

Out of all these initiatives it’s worth highlighting, for their quality and breadth, Generalitat’s Dades Obertes and the Barcelona open data portal. The Gencat Dades Obertes – published in Catalan, Spanish and English – puts together all the Catalan government’s open data initiatives into a single catalogue, and adds the most important information associated with them for reuse purposes. Data available on the site is very extensive and varied – including data on the 26,000 public facilities in Catalonia and 1,400 procedures handled in the Gencat’s offices -, and also includes lots of visual data – videos, images – and maps and other geographic data. This data is given in many different types of formats, and it’s available for reuse under four different licenses depending on its type and source, including two Creative Commons licenses. This portal also dedicates some space to feature applications made using the data available. Barcelona’s open data portal opened with 500 data sets classified in five broad themes – geography, demography, economy, city services and utilities, and administration – in various formats (csv, pdf, rdf, xls, xml and other). Licenses to reuse the data are mostly based on Creative Commons.

In Catalonia a culture of open information is slowly emerging. Yet it is not enough. First, like in the rest of Spain, “new” things happen only when they have been proved somewhere else. Second, the community of programmers in Catalonia, if such a thing can be said to exist, doesn’t seem to be interested in open data – or at least those that are interested seem to be few, not enough to push the open data into the political agenda with the same energy as in other countries. And third, the economic crisis, affecting particularly Spain and its regions, is certainly not facilitating the governments – national, regional or local – to implement policies to open public data.

In March 2012, the Spanish government introduced a bill on access to information, Ley de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información Pública y Buen Gobierno. In general terms, this bill lacks ambition and it’s very restrictive of the right to access to information, limiting it with a wide array of exceptions that go beyond accepted international standards. More specifically, concerning open data and electronic access to public sector information, this bill is just inadequate to regulate it and create a robust framework in which public, business and civic initiatives can flourish using the large amounts of data that governments produce. Leaving a fragmented regulation with the abovementioned Law 37/2007. Like other Spanish regions – notably Navarra, where an ambitious bill was introduced in January 2012 – the Catalan Parliament is currently discussing the writing of a bill to protect the right to access information of citizens and the publication of open data as emanating from this right. This bill is necessary for building a transparent, efficient and accountable government, and a society that can reutilize this data for emerging, new and creative applications. Nonetheless, according to some people familiar with the process of deliberation the bill being discussed is as lacking of ambition as the Spanish one. It seems that in Barcelona as in Madrid some people are very much afraid of losing their ships to the people’s rights.

On the way to the new market of information in Russia

June 29, 2012 in External, Linked Open Data, Open Government Data, Open Standards, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

On June 5th at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow a round table conference took place, devoted to the opening of state-collected datasets. It was convened by the Higher School of Economics (HSE) together with the Russian Office of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Open data is the new trend in the state practices of the developed countries, and Russia also acknowledges the importance of this trend. The Presidential Decree of May 7th 2012, “About key measures for the improvement of the state governmental system” states that it is important to publish open government data by July 15th, 2013.

Oleg Pak, from the Ministry of Economic Development, told the round-table that his department is currently developing the standards and the concept of open data in Russia. Within the framework of this concept, they will develop a comprehensive strategy for open data usage in Russia. This concept should become a roadmap for the work of all authorities engaged in the realization of this vision.

As a rule, the realization of national projects for open data has two goals. The first is socio-political – the State should open the data for its citizens. This goal can be easily achieved with the existing level of technology. The main issue at the discussion in June was the achievement of the second goal: the transformation of state data arrays into a product suitable for cost-effective use. This would allow businesses to form a new structure of services, and offer previously non-existent things on the market.

In many countries, this is already happening, as Victor Klintsov (W3C, HSE) pointed out. “The USA Administration has already published over a million data sets. This has been published not for “readers”, but for computers and services which use this data for development of new data, products and services”, he said. Pavel Pugachev (Ministry of Communications and Mass Communications) cited the example of an IT-company in the US. Its programmers use anonymised medical data about outbreaks and numbers of patients, process it and supply large pharmaceutical companies with the results. This allows those companies to develop their demand and supply tactics. Pugachev suggested we ought to determine the open data priorities according to which data types will be most interesting to the market, and concentrate our efforts on opening them first and foremost.

A key issue in the data that is being opened in Russia is that of interoperability. Releases so far have been based on the idea of human consumption – it is largely unsuitable for computer “consumption”, being unmatched and in different formats. This massively limits its business potential. Meanwhile, in Moscow alone there are 4,000 portals state-owned portals and organizations without consistent principles of data delivery. Common publishing standards need to be established as a matter of priority.

Nonetheless, as Daniel Hladky (W3C) pointed out, we cannot simply wait for the development of all the regulations that will allow perfect publication: “Publish, what you have. As you can and by any means. Good or bad, with mistakes, unattractively, even if 90% of this data will be badly structured. Maybe it lacks metadata. I would like to say that it is necessary to pick up speed. If 5% of the information is useful, it will be a start and a push for the development of business”. In developed countries the open data market started not from acts of government, but from the activity of individuals who collected information and published it on their portals, bringing it up to a machine-processable state.

This opinion was supported by Maksim Dubinin (OpenStreetMap, GIS-Lab projects): “The community of users and the culture of usage will not appear until open data is presented in large enough quantities”. He shared his experience in the area of geodata. “When it became clear that it was impossible to wait for governmental steps in this field, projects started to appear in which users contributed geodata by themselves. Over 600,000 people around the world have taken part in the OpenStreetMap project. As a result, some governmental organizations have started using data created by users.”

Undoubtedly, this needs to come from both ends at once.

Progress with Russian open data projects will be presented by Daniel Hladky during the European commission workshop Using Open Data: policy modeling, citizen empowerment, data journalism, which is going to take place in Brussels this week.

Victor Klintsov promised that the next meeting of the round table participants will be held this autumn. W3C office is planning to invite the leaders of open data projects from the USA and Great Britain.

The shorthand transcript and presentation graphics of the round table conference will be published on the site of W3C Russian office www.w3c.org.ru

Taking “utmost transparency” to the next level – at4am for all!

June 27, 2012 in Free Culture, Legal, Open Government Data, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

What? When?? Where??? How?!?! were the questions that got me started some 10 years ago now, on my free software journey that’s taken me to the heart of the European Parliament. As a young Swedish musician, politically innocent and ignorant as the next, I got worked up together with a bunch of newborn stallmanites unleashing ourselves on the internet determined to kill the software patents directive. There was a lot of code. I remember Xavi rewrote the EU’s co-decision procedure algorithm in java to be able to understand it, and that our content management system said ‘Cannot parse this Directive’ instead of returning 404. The tracking of MEPs was managed by Knecht, an email driven content management program written in lisp (insert awe comment here), and I cannot remember the number of different perl scripts that were playing around with voting results. It all ended happily (we won), and I still say “Can I have a B-item please!” whenever I get to go for drink with Miernik or Jonas.

You might think things would be different when you’re on the inside. I have been working in the European Parliament since the last elections, but it turns out at least three of the questions are still the same – What? When?? Where??? One administrative response from the institution is to serve the MEPs and their staff with iPads and intranet pages. Users of iPads and intranet are happy. But I am not. I have decided with a bunch of old stubborn stallmanites to try to use free software in the European Parliament as far as humanly possible. And we do. And it is (partially) possible. We put up a sign at FOSDEM in February last year calling for help and now we are 2 patrons, 13 members and 29 supporters. You can find info on how to become a supporter or a member (or even patron) of European Parliament Free Software Users Group (EPFSUG) here.

Another administrative answer by the institution to the questions above has been to build an Automatic Tool for AMendments, at4am. If ever I can nominate anybody to the Nobel Peace Prize, it would be the at4am developers team who have made this brilliant application possible. They have succeeded in making independent and competing committees in the European Parliament cooperate to provide information on their internal workings that can be parsed into a unified way of tabling amendments. It’s huge. Imagine a world without git (or anything like it) and then there is git – that is how epic this application is. More than 150k amendments has been tabled since its launch. I’d say that the same number of tears and curses have been saved.

Now, to close this already long, bushy and wild blog post with the reason for it in the first place: The at4am team has decided to share the code with the world, and on Wednesday 11 July we’re going to talk about which license would be best to use. The event is kindly hosted by MEP Marie-Christine Vergiat, and Carlo Piana and Karsten Gerloff from Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) are going to speak. Please come! A follow up meeting should of course focus on how to get the data out of the EP intranet and which licence would then be the best to use.

Why? Because the question “How?!?!” actually has an answer already. Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament reads as follows:

Transparency of Parliament’s activities

  1. Parliament shall ensure that its activities are conducted with the utmost transparency, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 1 of the Treaty on European Union, Article 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

That’s a pretty serious standard. Come join to give it meaning! Let’s figure out how to make utmost transparency work in practice.

International Open Legislative Data Conference, July 6-7, Paris!

June 25, 2012 in Events, Legal, Open Government Data, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

While the newly elected French National Assembly gets ready to choose its president, the question of its modernisation keeps arising. From the academic research world to the hacktivist perspective, parliamentary monitoring and studies are flourishing in France and all over the world. Methods and techniques may differ, but all share one common need: larger transparency regarding parliamentary activity, meaning raw OpenData access to legislative data.

That is the core of the international Open Legislative Data Conference we are organising in Paris on July 6th and 7th together with our academic partners at Sciences-Po, for our project “The Law Factory”. With speakers coming from all over the world, this two-day event will be an opportunity to discuss all kinds of experiences within the field of parliamentary informatics: law tracking, parliamentary monitoring, citizen involvement, rollcall vote analysis and accountability, the study of speeches, and of course raw access to bulk data from parliaments around the world.

On Friday the 6th, the conference will start at Sciences-Po, with a plenary session in the morning introducing various ongoing projects including “The Law Factory” initiated by the conference organizers, and the work on a future “Declaration for Parliamentary Openness”. About 30 different speakers will then present, including Bruno Latour (Sciences-Po’s Medialab), Daniel Schuman (Sunlight Foundation), Claire-Emmanuelle Longuet (French Senate), Tom Steinberg (mySociety), Maria Baron (Latin America Network for Legislative Transparency), Ashok Hariharan (UN’s AkomaNToso project), and many others.

In the afternoon, six working sessions will be held in 3 parallel workshops on the different themes so that participants can share and exchange after a few introductory talks. On Saturday the 7th of July, “La Cantine”, a co-working space used for hosting hackathons and barcamps, will host informal sessions and discussions to enhance cooperation.

Gathering together people from very different horizons, this English-speaking conference is open to anyone: Join us and register! Read the full programme

Denmark drops reform of EU access to documents rules as disagreements prove insurmountable

June 20, 2012 in News, Open Access, Open Government Data, WG EU Open Data, WG Open Government Data

The Danish Presidency of the Council of the EU yesterday gave up on trying to reach an agreement between the European Commission, the Parliament and the Member States on reform of the rules that govern public access to EU documents.

With the European Parliament standing firmly in favour of greater transparency for citizens, and the European Commission pressing for amendments to the Regulation that would exclude entire classes of information or narrow the definition of a document, the process hinged on an agreement between the 27 Member States meeting in the Council.

But divisions between the Member States were so acute that the Danish Presidency has abandoned the file after six months of intense negotiations. The public is not allowed access to the positions of each individual Member State in the Council (a practice being challenged by Access Info Europe before the European Court of Justice), but government and Council sources involved in the negotiations report that a majority of Member States – particularly large countries including France and Germany – either support the Commission’s approach or have been proposing further transparency-reducing amendments.

With the key players in polarised positions, it was clear that the current version of Regulation 1049/2001 is of a higher standard and that the compromise necessary to reach an agreement required sacrifices, which neither the European Parliament nor the Danish Presidency are willing to allow – see the comparison between 1049 and the other proposals here.

The collapse of the negotiations on reform Regulation 1049 means that the existing rules will stay in place, but it leaves two outstanding issues.

The first is whether some reforms are needed to comply with the Treaty of Lisbon, which obliges the EU institutions to take decisions “as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen” and which requires a transparent legislative process. The European Charter of Fundamental Rights also now recognises the right of access to EU documents “whatever their medium”, as a fundamental human right. At the very least the Treaties extend the scope of the right of access to all EU bodies and it is not clear whether this requires a legislative amendment to do away with current discrepancies such as different time frames for different EU bodies.

The second undecided issue is the Commission’s 2008 reform proposal, which remains open for any Member State to pick up again once they reach the Council Presidency. Access Info Europe is concerned at this “loose end” which leaves room for less transparency-friendly countries to push through regressive reforms if the Commission does not withdraw the file.

Data Catalog Schema and Protocol – Draft Specification

June 13, 2012 in CKAN, LOD2, Open Data, Open Government Data, Open Standards, Our Work, WG Open Government Data

Open Data is an idea that continues to gain momentum, and one of the signs of this is that the world has more and more data catalogs. This is great for many reasons but it also brings its own problem especially around interoperability and standardization — the lack of standard schema and interfaces is something we’ve experienced in our work on projects like which pulls together dataset information from many different data catalogs around Europe.

Last year we convened an international data catalogs meeting in Edinburgh. Since then we at the Open Knowledge Foundation, in collaboration and consultation with the W3C’s DCAT team, have been working on a draft specification for a data catalog schema (format) and protocol for accessing and syncing data catalogs. A first draft of this standard is now ready and we’re putting out a request for comments:


Contribute

Roughly the specification consists of 2 parts:

  1. A schema (in essence DCAT) specifying a serialization of Dataset information,
  2. A protocol / API for getting this information from a compliant data catalogue site.

We emphasize that this is a first draft, and is intentionally fairly rough as an invitation to contribute. You can do this in several ways:

Infokultura and Apps4Russia

May 21, 2012 in External, Open Government Data, WG Open Government Data

During recent years, the Russian Federation has undertaken a number of developments in its open data legislation strategy. This trend inspired a team of professionals to get together and start a non-profit organization, “INFOKULTURA”.

Understanding that data availability is crucial for an information society and the development of an information culture, we emphasise the establishment and promotion of Open Data concept though a number of activities, for example the Apps4Russia Contest, conferences, seminars, research and expertise provision. It is worth mentioning that not only technical capacities and access to the Internet are needed to promote the idea of informational culture as an important social topic: the lack of administrative burden, technological, legal, time and other constraints on the data availability are essential. These problems can be solved with the help of open licenses, open standards and open data sources.

warfly Warfly – one of last year’s Apps4Russia winners

Here in Russia, there is growing interest among society and State authorities in Open Data expertise, and in responding to it “INFOKULTURA” has developed a set of proposals in support of the development, implementation and promotion of effective tools for efficient and successful information interaction between government and society.

During discussions and team meetings it was agreed that the main goals of the organization should be focused on promoting the following ideas:

  • Information Culture – human activity that is associated with self-actualization and the individual initiatives manifested within the information society. Information culture is based on new data production, communication, environment change, integration of humanity into a common information space and the development of digital tools in order to create more varieties of information.
  • Open Government – new modes of interaction between the government authorities and other public institutions in which the bodies that compose the state government provide a broad disclosure of its activities, provide feedback mechanisms for citizens and public institutions, and an operational set of tools for citizens and public institutions to influence the decision-making process.
  • Civilian Control – the way the society can have influence with government bodies and institutions, develop the public good, and help to solve social problems.
  • Plain Language – the idea that the society deserves clear communications from the government authorities – clear and concise language designed to ensure the recipient understands as quickly and completely as possible. Plain language seeks to be easy to read, understand, and use.
  • Understandable Government – a new platform to broaden and ease official communications between government and society via Infographic tools, Clear visualized guidance and other comprehensive interaction mechanisms that designed to help people find out new ways to engage with State agencies, and take action to improve the way they work.

Apps4Russia Contest

In April 2012 the second Apps4Russia contest was announced at RIF+CIB 2012, the Internet industry’s main event in Russia.

The Apps4Russia contest was initiated to promote the idea of Open Data. The main goal is to encourage Russian developers to create projects based on Open Government Data, aiming to increase public benefit and improve government transparency.

In 2011 the Apps4Russia was held in the private initiative format with a prize fund of EUR 4,000. This year the prize fund has been significantly increased since it is expected that more developers from various levels, inlcuding school students, will submit to the contest.

In 2011 the following Submissions were nominated and awarded:

  • “Fire tracking concept” – public monitoring of the natural resources;
  • “DataPult” – interactive infographics data based on downloaded statistics;
  • “Warfly: World War II aerial photography” – aerial photographs of Russian and West European cities during the period 1939-1945. All photographs are synchronized with modern landscape.

datapult Datapult – one of last year’s Apps4Russia winners

This year all submissions will be reviewed under the following categories:

  • Great — main competition for all developers. (Examples topics: anti-corruption, clear and plain statistics, environmental monitoring, Russia’s role in the global world etc.)
  • Junior — school students competition (individual and group entries)
  • Visualization — interactive and poster infographics competition based on Open Data resources;
  • Cities and urban life environment — web-sites and applications created to improve urban life environment, through citizens and community initiatives

Call for Proposals timeframe: April – September
Summing up date – 12 September 2012 (Day of the Programmer).

Official web-site: http://www.apps4russia.ru

UK Open Standards Consultation

April 18, 2012 in Campaigning, External, Open Data, Open Government Data, Open Standards, Open/Closed, WG Open Government Data

The following post is cross-posted from Jeni’s blog – http://www.jenitennison.com/blog/

Over the last few months, the UK Government has been running a consultation on its Open Standards policy. The outcome of this consultation is incredibly important not only for organisations and individuals who want to work with government but also because of its potential knock-on effects on the publication of Open Data and the use of Open Source software within public sector organisations.

Unsurprisingly, Microsoft, Qualcomm and other organisations who have a vested interest in keeping the UK Government locked in to their products are responding vociferously to the consultation. They risk not only losing business to smaller enterprises within the UK but also, if the policy is successfully adopted here, in other countries in Europe and internationally that follow suit.

If we want our Government to be Open — to use Open Standards, to publish Open Data, to adopt Open Source — then we must respond to this consultation in numbers.

There are three things that you can do:

  1. Respond to the consultation — made even easier by this response form developed by Ric Harvey
  2. Attend the events — these seem pretty full now, but try to get in if you can
  3. Spread the message — blog and tweet and write to raise awareness of the importance and impact that this consultation could have

The consultation is quite long and there are a lot of questions to answer. In the hope of making this easier for everyone, I’ve published my response over on my blog. Please consider these responses public domain, and feel free to copy as much or as little as you like from them (though I recommend you omit the parts that are about my individual experience and substitute them with your own).

For extra background, read:

Launching the Open Data Census 2012!

April 17, 2012 in Featured, Open Government Data, Open/Closed, Our Work, WG Open Government Data

To take part in the Open Data Census 2012, please visit: http://opengovernmentdata.org/census/submit/.

As government officials, civil society leaders and open data experts gather in Brazil this week for the Open Government Partnership, it is clear that Open Government Data has become a major topic on a global scale. In September last year, 8 governments founded the Open Government Partnership. Little more than six months on, and a further 43 have signed-up and endorsed the Open Government Declaration already. The movement is big and it’s growing.

At the close of last year’s Open Government Data Camp, the Open Knowledge Foundation announced plans to launch an Open Data Census in 2012. Since then, preparations have been underway. And this week, to coincide with the Open Government Partnership meeting, the Open Data Census is going live!

What is the Open Data Census?

The Open Data Census 2012 is an attempt to monitor the current status of open data across the globe.

The primary focus of the Census is data. Policies are crucial, but as Chris Taggart’s analysis of corporate data demonstrates, actual practice can be very different. Focussing on data will also allow us to keep the census very concrete. Analysing policy or even law is a complex process; whether a dataset is ‘open’ or not is usually a clear yes or no answer.

In this Census, we are interested in the current status of data: is it open, is it accessible, can I use it now?

We hope to gather responses from every country in the world. To find out how to contribute on behalf of your country, read on below!

What will the Open Data Census look at?

In the first incarnation of the 2012 Census, we have decided to look only at ten specific datasets. We hope to expand this in future, and we welcome suggestions for new datasets to include (see below).

For each dataset, we will explore whether it is:

  • a) available in a digital form
  • b) machine-readable
  • c) publicly available, free of charge
  • d) openly licensed

A yes to all of these questions imply that the dataset is open data.

We are primarily seeking binary yes / no responses – but we have allowed a space for comments in case the situation is not clear cut.

The datasets have been chosen for their breadth and relevance. We have attempted to select data which most governments could reasonably be expected to collect. The ten datasets are:

  1. Election Results (national)
  2. Company Register
  3. National Map (Low resolution: 1:250,000 or better)
  4. Government Budget (high level – spending by sector)
  5. Government Budget (detailed – transactional level data)
  6. Legislation (laws and statutes)
  7. National Statistical Office Data (economic and demographic information)
  8. National Postcode/ZIP database
  9. Public Transport Timetables
  10. Environmental Data on major sources of pollutants (e.g. location, emissions)

It may be that some people have already begun collecting information in some of these areas. We’re keen not to duplicate efforts, so please do get in touch if you have information which is relevant.

So what next?

Our biggest challenge is to start gathering responses!

Take part in the Census

  • To take part in the Open Data Census 2012, please visit: http://opengovernmentdata.org/census/submit/
  • You should submit one census form per dataset per country.
  • You can see which countries and datasets have already been submitted at .
  • If you notice an error in a submitted form or are able to add more information, please submit a new census form for that country and dataset. Please highlight the correction in your comments.

Give us feedback for the future

  • We welcome all feedback on the Census. We also welcome suggestions for new datasets to include in future Censuses. Please email info[@]okfn.org with your comments
  • If you would like to become more involved with the Open Data Census 2012, please sign-up to the Open Government mailing list
  • The Open Government working group welcomes everyone with an interest in Open Government. See our website to find out more.

Watch this Space!

  • We hope to make the results of the Open Data Census 2012 available later this year. Keep an eye on the blog for more details!

Please create an account to get started.

Sign up to the Open Knowledge Newsletter

Get Updates